QX60 Autograph vs Q6 e-tron Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
7
5
5033
/
1981
/
1770
/
2900
/
170
/
Fuel Economy
8.7
/
Interior
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
Triple
/
✓
/
Transmission
AT
DHT
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
/
Key Spec
3.5 L - 3.5 L
/
265 BHP - 295 BHP
279 BHP
AT & Automatic & CVT
DHT
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
6 Seater - 7
5
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
3.5
/
Gasoline
Electric
279
279 BHP
350
/
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
QX60 Autograph
Q6 e-tron
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickQ6 e-tron
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose QX60 Autograph if you care more about overall equipment; choose Q6 e-tron if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, QX60 Autograph has a fuel consumption of 11.49, while Q6 e-tron has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, QX60 Autograph has a wheelbase of 2900, while Q6 e-tron has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. QX60 Autograph uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Q6 e-tron uses No data.