QX60 Autograph vs Vitara 1.6L GLX+ 2WD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
180 km/h
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
5033
4175 mm
1981
1775 mm
1770
1610 mm
2900
2500 mm
170
/
/
375 L
Fuel Economy
8.7
17.2 Km/L
/
47 L
/
17.2 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
Triple
/
✓
/
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
AT
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.5 L - 3.5 L
1.6 L - 1586 L
265 BHP - 295 BHP
115 BHP
AT & Automatic & CVT
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
6 Seater - 7
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.5
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
279
115 BHP
350
156 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
QX60 Autograph
Vitara 1.6L GLX+ 2WD
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickVitara 1.6L GLX+ 2WD
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose QX60 Autograph if you care more about interior space; choose Vitara 1.6L GLX+ 2WD if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, QX60 Autograph has a fuel consumption of 11.49, while Vitara 1.6L GLX+ 2WD has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, Vitara 1.6L GLX+ 2WD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, QX60 Autograph has a wheelbase of 2900, while Vitara 1.6L GLX+ 2WD has a wheelbase of 2500 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, QX60 Autograph, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. QX60 Autograph uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Vitara 1.6L GLX+ 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive.