CarteaCompare CarsQX60 Sensory vs T1 i-DM Standard

QX60 Sensory vs T1 i-DM Standard Comparison

Car Information

/

117 KM

/

26.7

Engine / Motor

/

1499

Dimensions

7

5

5033

4705

1981

1967

1770

1843

2900

2800

170

160

/

2000

/

5

/

574

Fuel Economy

8.7

18.5

/

70

Comfort

/

/

/

Interior

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front and Back Row Seats

/

Triple

/

/

/

/

15.6"

/

10.25"

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

9

Battery/Charging

/

0.5

Transmission

AT

1DHT

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

/

/

MacPherson

/

Electric Powered

Wheels/brakes

/

Ventilated

/

Disc

/

235/60 R19

/

235/60 R19

Key Spec

3.5 L - 3.5 L

1.5

265 BHP - 295 BHP

335

AT & Automatic & CVT

1DHT

Gasoline & Petrol

Hybrid

TBD

TBD

6 Seater - 7

5

Exterior

/

/

كهربائي

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.5

1.5

Gasoline

Hybrid

279

335

350

530

/

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Motor

/

310

/

LiFePO4 Battery

/

Permanent magnet synchronous motor

/

150

/

P3

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • QX60 Sensory

    • T1 i-DM Standard

      • Heated Side Mirrors
      • Parking sensor rear
      • Parking sensor front
      • Collision Detection
      • Blind Spot Warning
      • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
      • Seatbelt pretensioner
      • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
      • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
      • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
      • Driver Seat Belt Warning
      • ABS
      • EBD/CBC
      • EBA/BA
      • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
      • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
      • Active Safety Warning System
      • Passive Pedestrian Protection
      • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
      • Child Lock

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickT1 i-DM Standard

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose QX60 Sensory if you care more about fuel economy; choose T1 i-DM Standard if you care more about price.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Infiniti | QX60 Sensory

    VS

    Mercedes Benz | EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC

    Infiniti | QX60 Sensory

    VS

    Toyota | Toyota Land Cruiser 2018 4.6L GXR

    Infiniti | QX60 Sensory

    VS

    Ford | Ford Bronco 2021 2.7T Big Lands

    Infiniti | QX60 Sensory

    VS

    Lincoln | Lincoln Nautilus 2024 2.7T V6 Reserve LUX PKG

    Infiniti | QX60 Sensory

    VS

    Porsche | Porsche Macan 2020 S

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, QX60 Sensory has a fuel consumption of 11.49, while T1 i-DM Standard has a fuel consumption of 117 KM. Therefore, QX60 Sensory is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, QX60 Sensory has a wheelbase of 2900, while T1 i-DM Standard has a wheelbase of 2800. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, QX60 Sensory, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. QX60 Sensory uses Four-Wheel Drive, while T1 i-DM Standard uses No data.