QX60 Sensory vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2018 4.6L GXR Comparison
Car Information
SUV
/
Engine / Motor
/
200
/
8
Dimensions
7
8 Seater
5033
5170
1981
1980
1770
1930
2900
2850
170
/
/
456
Fuel Economy
8.7
6.9
/
138
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
Triple
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
AT
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.5 L - 3.5 L
3.3 L - 5.7 L
265 BHP - 295 BHP
240 BHP - 409
AT & Automatic & CVT
10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode & Automatic & Manual
Gasoline & Petrol
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
6 Seater - 7
7 - 8 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.5
4.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
279
304 BHP
350
439
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
QX60 Sensory
Toyota Land Cruiser 2018 4.6L GXR
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Cool Box
- Rear Defogger
- Rear AC Controls
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Auto Door Lock
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Related comparisons
Editor's PickQX60 Sensory
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose QX60 Sensory if you care more about price; choose Toyota Land Cruiser 2018 4.6L GXR if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, QX60 Sensory has a fuel consumption of 11.49, while Toyota Land Cruiser 2018 4.6L GXR has a fuel consumption of 14.49. Therefore, QX60 Sensory is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, QX60 Sensory has a wheelbase of 2900, while Toyota Land Cruiser 2018 4.6L GXR has a wheelbase of 2850. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, QX60 Sensory, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. QX60 Sensory uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Toyota Land Cruiser 2018 4.6L GXR uses All Wheel Drive.