QX60 Sensory vs Tiggo7 Pro Max COM Comparison
Car Information
SUV
/
Dimensions
7
5
5033
4500
1981
1842
1770
1746
2900
2670
170
/
/
Flush Door
/
18
/
5
Fuel Economy
8.7
16.6
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
Interior
✓
/
Front Row Seats
Driver Seat
Front and Back Row Seats
/
Triple
Dual
✓
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
12.3
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
AT
7DCT
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Key Spec
3.5 L - 3.5 L
1.5 L - 1.6 L
265 BHP - 295 BHP
154 - 197 BHP
AT & Automatic & CVT
6DCT AT & 7-speed Dual-Clutch Transmission (DCT) & 7DCT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
6 Seater - 7
5
Exterior
✓
/
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.5
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
279
197 BHP
350
290
/
1.6L TDGI
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
QX60 Sensory
Tiggo7 Pro Max COM
- 360 Degree Camera
- Push Button Start
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Steering Adjustment
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickTiggo7 Pro Max COM
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose QX60 Sensory if you care more about interior space; choose Tiggo7 Pro Max COM if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, QX60 Sensory has a fuel consumption of 11.49, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM has a fuel consumption of 6.02. Therefore, Tiggo7 Pro Max COM is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, QX60 Sensory has a wheelbase of 2900, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM has a wheelbase of 2670. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, QX60 Sensory, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. QX60 Sensory uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM uses Front Drive.