Range Rover Evoque 2.0T R-Dynamic HSE (250 PS) vs Yukon 5.3 V8 SLE (2WD) Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

230 km/h

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

7 Seater

4371 mm

5334 mm

1996 mm

2057 mm

1649 mm

1943 mm

2681 mm

3071 mm

472 L

/

Fuel Economy

13.5 Km/L

/

67 L

/

/

/

Comfort

/

Safety

/

Transmission

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.0 L

5.3 L - 6.2 L

200 BHP - 250 BHP

320 BHP - 420 BHP

Automatic

10 SPEED AUTOMATIC & Automatic

Gasoline

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

7 - 9 Seater

Engine

2.0 L

5.3 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

250 BHP

355 BHP

365 Nm

520 Nm

Exterior

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Range Rover Evoque 2.0T R-Dynamic HSE (250 PS)

    • 360 Degree camera
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
  • Yukon 5.3 V8 SLE (2WD)

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Spacious interior space
  • Excellent towing capabilities
  • Advanced entertainment systems

Negative

  • High fuel consumption
  • Their price is relatively high
  • Its large size may be inappropriate for some areas

Related comparisons

Editor's PickYukon 5.3 V8 SLE (2WD)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Range Rover Evoque 2.0T R-Dynamic HSE (250 PS) if you care more about overall equipment; choose Yukon 5.3 V8 SLE (2WD) if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Land Rover | Range Rover Evoque 2.0T R-Dynamic HSE (250 PS)

VS

Dodge | Durango 3.6L GT(RWD)

Land Rover | Range Rover Evoque 2.0T R-Dynamic HSE (250 PS)

VS

Li Auto | Li Auto L9 2024 1.5T Ultra

Land Rover | Range Rover Evoque 2.0T R-Dynamic HSE (250 PS)

VS

Chevrolet | Tahoe Premier

Land Rover | Range Rover Evoque 2.0T R-Dynamic HSE (250 PS)

VS

Chevrolet | Tahoe RST

Land Rover | Range Rover Evoque 2.0T R-Dynamic HSE (250 PS)

VS

Chevrolet | Chevrolet Tahoe 2023 5.3L RST 4WD

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Range Rover Evoque 2.0T R-Dynamic HSE (250 PS) has a fuel consumption of 7.41, while Yukon 5.3 V8 SLE (2WD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Range Rover Evoque 2.0T R-Dynamic HSE (250 PS) has a wheelbase of 2681 mm, while Yukon 5.3 V8 SLE (2WD) has a wheelbase of 3071 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Yukon 5.3 V8 SLE (2WD), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Range Rover Evoque 2.0T R-Dynamic HSE (250 PS) uses All Wheel Drive, while Yukon 5.3 V8 SLE (2WD) uses Front Wheel Drive.