CarteaCompare CarsRange Rover Velar 2.0L R-Dynamic SE (250 PS) vs Bronco Badlands 2.7L

Range Rover Velar 2.0L R-Dynamic SE (250 PS) vs Bronco Badlands 2.7L Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

217 km/h

180 km/h

/

6

/

2698 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

4803 mm

4800 mm

2032 mm

1937 mm

1666 mm

1962 mm

2873 mm

2950 mm

532 L

562 L

/

4 Doors

/

260 m

Fuel Economy

13.2

9.2 Km/L

63 L

79 L

13.2 Km/L

9.2 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

12

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

7

Transmission

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Four Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.0 L - 3.0 L

2.3 L - 3.0 L

246 BHP - 340 BHP

181 - 418 BHP

Automatic

8-speed Automatic & Automatic

Gasoline

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

4 - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

2.7 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

250 BHP

330 BHP

365 Nm

542 Nm

/

V

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Range Rover Velar 2.0L R-Dynamic SE (250 PS)

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS
  • Bronco Badlands 2.7L

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Attractive and iconic design
  • Excellent off-road capabilities
  • Multiple engine options

Negative

  • High price for top categories
  • Limited internal storage space
  • Significant fuel consumption

Related comparisons

Editor's PickBronco Badlands 2.7L

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Range Rover Velar 2.0L R-Dynamic SE (250 PS) if you care more about fuel economy; choose Bronco Badlands 2.7L if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Land Rover | Range Rover Velar 2.0L R-Dynamic SE (250 PS)

VS

Audi | Q5 Sportback 45 TFSI quattro Advanced 2.0L (245 HP)

Land Rover | Range Rover Velar 2.0L R-Dynamic SE (250 PS)

VS

Nissan | PATROL SE Titanium

Land Rover | Range Rover Velar 2.0L R-Dynamic SE (250 PS)

VS

Cadillac | Cadillac XTS 2018 3.6L V-Sport Platinum

Land Rover | Range Rover Velar 2.0L R-Dynamic SE (250 PS)

VS

Volkswagen | Touareg R-Line 3.0L

Land Rover | Range Rover Velar 2.0L R-Dynamic SE (250 PS)

VS

Ford | Ford Expedition 2018 3.5L EcoBoost Platinum

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Range Rover Velar 2.0L R-Dynamic SE (250 PS) has a fuel consumption of 7.58, while Bronco Badlands 2.7L has a fuel consumption of 10.87. Therefore, Range Rover Velar 2.0L R-Dynamic SE (250 PS) is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Range Rover Velar 2.0L R-Dynamic SE (250 PS) has a wheelbase of 2873 mm, while Bronco Badlands 2.7L has a wheelbase of 2950 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Bronco Badlands 2.7L, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Range Rover Velar 2.0L R-Dynamic SE (250 PS) uses All Wheel Drive, while Bronco Badlands 2.7L uses Four Wheel Drive.