Range Rover Velar 2.0L R-Dynamic SE (250 PS) vs Max RS Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
217 km/h
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4803 mm
4785
2032 mm
1930
1666 mm
1625
2873 mm
2880
532 L
/
/
20"
Fuel Economy
13.2
/
63 L
56
13.2 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
/
Front Row Seats
/
10.2
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
✓
/
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
19
Transmission
Automatic
single-speed AT
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
double wishbone suspension
/
multi-link suspension
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.0 L
1.5L
246 BHP - 340 BHP
496 hp
Automatic
AT & single-speed AT
Gasoline
Electric & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
1.5L
Gasoline
Hybrid
250 BHP
496 hp
365 Nm
675
/
Turbocharge
/
365
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Range Rover Velar 2.0L R-Dynamic SE (250 PS)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Max RS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMax RS
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Range Rover Velar 2.0L R-Dynamic SE (250 PS) if you care more about overall equipment; choose Max RS if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Range Rover Velar 2.0L R-Dynamic SE (250 PS) has a fuel consumption of 7.58, while Max RS has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Range Rover Velar 2.0L R-Dynamic SE (250 PS) has a wheelbase of 2873 mm, while Max RS has a wheelbase of 2880. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Max RS , offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Range Rover Velar 2.0L R-Dynamic SE (250 PS) uses All Wheel Drive, while Max RS uses Four-Wheel Drive.