Ranger XLT 2.0 Diesel 4WD MT vs RAM 1500 2024 3.6L BigHorn Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
175
4
6
1998 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
3 Seater
4 Doors
/
5370 mm
5817
1918 mm
2018
1884 mm
1968
3270 mm
3569
1200 L
1500
230
/
Fuel Economy
8 Km/L
10.4
80 L
87
8 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Standard
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
6MT
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.2 L
3.6 L - 5.7 L
118 BHP - 392 BHP
305 BHP - 395 BHP
10AT & 6MT & AT & Automatic & Manual
Automatic
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
3 Seater - 5
3 Seater - 5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
3.6 L
Diesel
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
168 BHP
305 BHP
405 Nm
364
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Ranger XLT 2.0 Diesel 4WD MT
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
RAM 1500 2024 3.6L BigHorn
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Runflat Tyres
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Active Bonnet
- Acceleration Skid Control
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Auto Door Lock
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Ranger XLT 2.0 Diesel 4WD MT if you care more about overall equipment; choose RAM 1500 2024 3.6L BigHorn if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Ranger XLT 2.0 Diesel 4WD MT has a fuel consumption of 12.5, while RAM 1500 2024 3.6L BigHorn has a fuel consumption of 9.62. Therefore, RAM 1500 2024 3.6L BigHorn is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Ranger XLT 2.0 Diesel 4WD MT has a wheelbase of 3270 mm, while RAM 1500 2024 3.6L BigHorn has a wheelbase of 3569. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, RAM 1500 2024 3.6L BigHorn, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Ranger XLT 2.0 Diesel 4WD MT uses Four-Wheel Drive, while RAM 1500 2024 3.6L BigHorn uses All Wheel Drive.