RAV4 2.5L (4WD) EXR vs 5008 1.6T Allure plus Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
206 km/h
4
/
2490 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
5 Doors
/
4570 mm
4641 mm
1845 mm
1844 mm
1660 mm
1646 mm
2660 mm
2840 mm
/
952 L
Fuel Economy
14.2 Km/L
16.4 Km/L
55 L
53 L
14.2 Km/L
16.4 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.5 L - 2.5 L
1.6 L - 1.6 L
170 - 219
156 BHP - 180
8 Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic & Continuous Variable Transmission (CVT)
Automatic & Automatic
Gasoline & Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
6 Seater - 7
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.5 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
None
/
4
/
203 BHP
165 BHP
243 Nm
240 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
RAV4 2.5L (4WD) EXR
5008 1.6T Allure plus
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- Economical in fuel consumption with strong performance
- Spacious and practical interior space
- Reliability and quality of safety equipment
Negative
- The suspension is a bit stiff
- Use of lower quality interior materials
- Less control of internal noise
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickRAV4 2.5L (4WD) EXR
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose RAV4 2.5L (4WD) EXR if you care more about price; choose 5008 1.6T Allure plus if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, RAV4 2.5L (4WD) EXR has a fuel consumption of 7.04, while 5008 1.6T Allure plus has a fuel consumption of 6.1. Therefore, 5008 1.6T Allure plus is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, RAV4 2.5L (4WD) EXR has a wheelbase of 2660 mm, while 5008 1.6T Allure plus has a wheelbase of 2840 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 5008 1.6T Allure plus, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. RAV4 2.5L (4WD) EXR uses Four Wheel Drive, while 5008 1.6T Allure plus uses Front Wheel Drive.