Renault Megane 2017 1.6L PE vs EQM5 T3 Edition Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
175
/
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
4 Seater
4302
5040 mm
2037
1910 mm
1471
1569 mm
2641
2990 mm
372
433 L
Fuel Economy
15.4
/
60
/
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Key Spec
1.6 L - 2.0 L
/
105 BHP - 143 BHP
134 BHP
Auto (CVT) & Automatic & Manual
DHT
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
5 - 5
4 Seater - 5
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.6 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
115 BHP
134 BHP
155
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Renault Megane 2017 1.6L PE
- Steering Adjustment
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
EQM5 T3 Edition
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEQM5 T3 Edition
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Renault Megane 2017 1.6L PE if you care more about overall equipment; choose EQM5 T3 Edition if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Renault Megane 2017 1.6L PE has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while EQM5 T3 Edition has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Renault Megane 2017 1.6L PE has a wheelbase of 2641, while EQM5 T3 Edition has a wheelbase of 2990 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EQM5 T3 Edition, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Renault Megane 2017 1.6L PE uses Front Wheel Drive, while EQM5 T3 Edition uses Front Wheel Drive.