Rich 2.4L DC (4x2) vs Navara 2.5L ASF 4x2 M/T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
160 km/h
160 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
6 Seater
5080 mm
5336 mm
1720 mm
2075 mm
1680 mm
1758 mm
3050 mm
3150 mm
830 L
/
Fuel Economy
12.7 Km/L
8.3 Km/L
60 L
80 L
12.7 Km/L
8.3 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
/
Manual
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.4 L
2.5 L
217 BHP
158 BHP - 168 BHP
Manual
Automatic & Manual
Gasoline
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater - 6 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
Engine
2.4 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
217 BHP
158 BHP
136 Nm
233 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
Rich 2.4L DC (4x2)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
Navara 2.5L ASF 4x2 M/T
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickRich 2.4L DC (4x2)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Rich 2.4L DC (4x2) if you care more about price; choose Navara 2.5L ASF 4x2 M/T if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Rich 2.4L DC (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 7.87, while Navara 2.5L ASF 4x2 M/T has a fuel consumption of 12.05. Therefore, Rich 2.4L DC (4x2) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Rich 2.4L DC (4x2) has a wheelbase of 3050 mm, while Navara 2.5L ASF 4x2 M/T has a wheelbase of 3150 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Navara 2.5L ASF 4x2 M/T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Rich 2.4L DC (4x2) uses Rear Wheel Drive, while Navara 2.5L ASF 4x2 M/T uses Rear Wheel Drive.