Rich 2.4L DC (4x2) vs Rich 2.4L DC (4x4) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
160 km/h
160 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5080 mm
5080 mm
1720 mm
1820 mm
1680 mm
1715 mm
3050 mm
3050 mm
830 L
830 L
Fuel Economy
12.7 Km/L
12.2 Km/L
60 L
60 L
12.7 Km/L
12.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.4 L
2.4 L
217 BHP
217 BHP
Manual
Manual
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
Engine
2.4 L
2.4 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
217 BHP
217 BHP
136 Nm
136 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
Rich 2.4L DC (4x2)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
Rich 2.4L DC (4x4)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickRich 2.4L DC (4x4)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Rich 2.4L DC (4x2) if you care more about fuel economy; choose Rich 2.4L DC (4x4) if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Rich 2.4L DC (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 7.87, while Rich 2.4L DC (4x4) has a fuel consumption of 8.2. Therefore, Rich 2.4L DC (4x2) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Rich 2.4L DC (4x2) has a wheelbase of 3050 mm, while Rich 2.4L DC (4x4) has a wheelbase of 3050 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Rich 2.4L DC (4x2) uses Rear Wheel Drive, while Rich 2.4L DC (4x4) uses All Wheel Drive.