RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback vs EHS9 Executive Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
280 km/h
200 km/h
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4507 mm
5209 mm
1851 mm
2010 mm
1557 mm
1713 mm
2681 mm
3110 mm
530 L
438 L
/
5 Doors
/
200 m
Fuel Economy
14.9 Km/L
/
64 L
/
14.9 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
4-Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Bucket
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
16.2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.5 L
/
400 BHP
429 BHP - 543 BHP
TBD
Automatic
Gasoline
Electric
TBD
/
5 Seater
4 Seater - 7 Seater
/
TBD
/
320 km - 515 km
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
400 BHP
429 BHP
480 Nm
300+450
Technologies
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
8
/
options.Lithium-Ion
/
160+245 kW
Comparison of configuration highlights
RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
EHS9 Executive
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickRS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback if you care more about price; choose EHS9 Executive if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback has a fuel consumption of 6.71, while EHS9 Executive has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback has a wheelbase of 2681 mm, while EHS9 Executive has a wheelbase of 3110 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EHS9 Executive, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback uses All Wheel Drive, while EHS9 Executive uses All Wheel Drive.