RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback vs IM Motors LS9 Ultra Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
280 km/h
220
Dimensions
5 Seater
6
4507 mm
5279
1851 mm
2000
1557 mm
1806
2681 mm
3160
530 L
372/1030
/
2670
/
20 / 21 / 22 inch
/
5
Fuel Economy
14.9 Km/L
/
64 L
✓
14.9 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
/
Digital
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Battery/Charging
/
10-80% in 16.5mins
Transmission
/
1-Speed Automatic EV Gearbox
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
✓
/
AWD
/
Double Wishbone + Air Suspension
/
Multi-link + Air Suspension
/
Electric Power Steering
Key Spec
2.5 L
/
400 BHP
517 - 530
TBD
1-Speed Automatic EV Gearbox
Gasoline
Electric
TBD
/
5 Seater
6
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Engine
2.5 L
1.5T Range Extender + Electric Motors
Gasoline
Electric
400 BHP
517
480 Nm
670
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
LFP
Comparison of configuration highlights
RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
IM Motors LS9 Ultra
- 360 Degree Camera
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Auto Door Lock
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Active Safety Warning System
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickRS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback if you care more about price; choose IM Motors LS9 Ultra if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback has a fuel consumption of 6.71, while IM Motors LS9 Ultra has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback has a wheelbase of 2681 mm, while IM Motors LS9 Ultra has a wheelbase of 3160. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, IM Motors LS9 Ultra, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback uses All Wheel Drive, while IM Motors LS9 Ultra uses Four-Wheel Drive.