RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback vs L9 Pro Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
280 km/h
/
/
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
6
4507 mm
5218
1851 mm
1998
1557 mm
1800
2681 mm
3105
530 L
/
/
Flush Door
/
20
/
5
/
6.15
/
176
Fuel Economy
14.9 Km/L
13.5
64 L
65
14.9 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Electric
Interior
/
✓
/
Front & Back Row Seats
/
4.82
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
OLED
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Nappa Leather
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Triple
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
15.7
/
15.7
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
19
Transmission
/
1
/
AT
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
✓
/
Double wishbone front suspension
/
Five-link rear suspension
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
255/50 R20
/
255/50 R20
Key Spec
2.5 L
1.5 L
400 BHP
440 BHP - 449 BHP
TBD
AT & Automatic
Gasoline
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
6 - 6
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
400 BHP
449 BHP
480 Nm
620
/
330
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comfort, Normal, Sport, Performance
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
L2
Motor
/
620
/
2
/
PMSM
/
330
/
449
Comparison of configuration highlights
RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
L9 Pro
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Cool Box
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- Rollover stability control
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Security System
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Auto Door Lock
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Active Safety Warning System
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback if you care more about fuel economy; choose L9 Pro if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback has a fuel consumption of 6.71, while L9 Pro has a fuel consumption of 7.41. Therefore, RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback has a wheelbase of 2681 mm, while L9 Pro has a wheelbase of 3105. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, L9 Pro, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback uses All Wheel Drive, while L9 Pro uses Four-Wheel Drive.