RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback vs Max RS Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
280 km/h
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4507 mm
4785
1851 mm
1930
1557 mm
1625
2681 mm
2880
530 L
/
/
20"
Fuel Economy
14.9 Km/L
/
64 L
56
14.9 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
/
Front Row Seats
/
10.2
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
Infotainment
/
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
19
Transmission
/
single-speed AT
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
double wishbone suspension
/
multi-link suspension
Key Spec
2.5 L
1.5L
400 BHP
496 hp
TBD
AT & single-speed AT
Gasoline
Electric & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
1.5L
Gasoline
Hybrid
400 BHP
496 hp
480 Nm
675
/
Turbocharge
/
365
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Max RS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMax RS
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback if you care more about overall equipment; choose Max RS if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback has a fuel consumption of 6.71, while Max RS has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback has a wheelbase of 2681 mm, while Max RS has a wheelbase of 2880. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Max RS , offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback uses All Wheel Drive, while Max RS uses Four-Wheel Drive.