RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback vs Q5 45 TFSI quattro Design Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
280 km/h
237 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4507 mm
4753 mm
1851 mm
1893 mm
1557 mm
1659 mm
2681 mm
2808 mm
530 L
550 L
Fuel Economy
14.9 Km/L
13.7 Km/L
64 L
70 L
14.9 Km/L
13.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.5 L
2.0 L - 3.2 L
400 BHP
211 BHP - 272 BHP
TBD
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater - 6 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Engine
2.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
400 BHP
252 BHP
480 Nm
370 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Q5 45 TFSI quattro Design
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickQ5 45 TFSI quattro Design
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback if you care more about fuel economy; choose Q5 45 TFSI quattro Design if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback has a fuel consumption of 6.71, while Q5 45 TFSI quattro Design has a fuel consumption of 7.3. Therefore, RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback has a wheelbase of 2681 mm, while Q5 45 TFSI quattro Design has a wheelbase of 2808 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Q5 45 TFSI quattro Design, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback uses All Wheel Drive, while Q5 45 TFSI quattro Design uses All Wheel Drive.