RS Q3 Sportback TFSI quattro 2.5L vs EHS9 Executive Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
200 km/h
4
/
2480 cc
/
GCC
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4485 mm
5209 mm
1856 mm
2010 mm
1585 mm
1713 mm
2680 mm
3110 mm
530 L
438 L
170 m
200 m
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
/
65 L
/
10 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Smart Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
Dual Zone
4-Zone
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Sports
Bucket
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
9
16.2
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
8
8
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.5 L
/
400 BHP
429 BHP - 543 BHP
TBD
Automatic
Gasoline
Electric
TBD
/
5 Seater
4 Seater - 7 Seater
/
TBD
/
320 km - 515 km
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.5 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
Single Turbo
/
4
/
400 BHP
429 BHP
480 Nm
300+450
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Motor
/
8
/
options.Lithium-Ion
/
160+245 kW
Comparison of configuration highlights
RS Q3 Sportback TFSI quattro 2.5L
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
EHS9 Executive
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose RS Q3 Sportback TFSI quattro 2.5L if you care more about price; choose EHS9 Executive if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, RS Q3 Sportback TFSI quattro 2.5L has a fuel consumption of 10, while EHS9 Executive has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, RS Q3 Sportback TFSI quattro 2.5L has a wheelbase of 2680 mm, while EHS9 Executive has a wheelbase of 3110 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EHS9 Executive, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. RS Q3 Sportback TFSI quattro 2.5L uses All Wheel Drive, while EHS9 Executive uses All Wheel Drive.