CarteaCompare CarsRS3 TFSI quattro 2.5L Sportback vs A 35 AMG 4MATIC Hatchback

RS3 TFSI quattro 2.5L Sportback vs A 35 AMG 4MATIC Hatchback Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

280 km/h

225 km/h

4

4

2480 cc

1990 cc

GCC

GCC

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

5 Doors

5 Doors

4492 mm

4447 mm

1816 mm

1797 mm

1425 mm

1407 mm

2521 mm

2729 mm

455 L

/

165 m

104 m

Fuel Economy

8 Km/L

15 Km/L

50 L

50 L

8 Km/L

15 Km/L

Comfort

Smart Entry

Smart Entry

/

/

Interior

Leather

Leather

Dual Zone

Dual Zone

Standard

Standard

/

/

Digital

/

Electric

Safety

/

/

Infotainment

9

10.6

Android LCD

Android LCD

8

/

Transmission

/

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.5 L

2.0 L

400 BHP

306 BHP

TBD

Automatic

Gasoline

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5 Seater

Exterior

LED

LED

/

/

Engine

In-Line

In-Line

2.5 L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

Single Turbo

None

4

4

400 BHP

306 BHP

500 Nm

400 Nm

Technologies

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • RS3 TFSI quattro 2.5L Sportback

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
  • A 35 AMG 4MATIC Hatchback

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickA 35 AMG 4MATIC Hatchback

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose RS3 TFSI quattro 2.5L Sportback if you care more about power; choose A 35 AMG 4MATIC Hatchback if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Audi | RS3 TFSI quattro 2.5L Sportback

VS

Mercedes Benz | A 35 AMG 4MATIC

Audi | RS3 TFSI quattro 2.5L Sportback

VS

Mercedes Benz | A 35 AMG 4MATIC

Audi | RS3 TFSI quattro 2.5L Sportback

VS

Mercedes Benz | A 35 AMG 4MATIC Hatchback

Audi | RS3 TFSI quattro 2.5L Sportback

VS

Mercedes Benz | A 35 AMG 4MATIC Hatchback

Audi | RS3 TFSI quattro 2.5L Sportback

VS

Zeekr | Zeekr 001 Flagship AWD

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, RS3 TFSI quattro 2.5L Sportback has a fuel consumption of 12.5, while A 35 AMG 4MATIC Hatchback has a fuel consumption of 6.67. Therefore, A 35 AMG 4MATIC Hatchback is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, RS3 TFSI quattro 2.5L Sportback has a wheelbase of 2521 mm, while A 35 AMG 4MATIC Hatchback has a wheelbase of 2729 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, A 35 AMG 4MATIC Hatchback, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. RS3 TFSI quattro 2.5L Sportback uses All Wheel Drive, while A 35 AMG 4MATIC Hatchback uses All Wheel Drive.