Rush 1.5L EX vs Omoda C7 Comfort Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
175 km/h
/
4
/
1490 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
5
5 Doors
/
4435 mm
4660
1695 mm
1875
1705 mm
1670
2685 mm
2720
213 L
/
/
1578
/
19"
/
176
Fuel Economy
12.5 Km/L
13.3
45 L
51
12.5 Km/L
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
Interior
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
15.6"
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
8.88"
/
√
/
Front Row Seats
/
√
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
✓
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
Transmission
Automatic
7DCT
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
/
/
Macpherson Strut
/
Multilink
Wheels/brakes
/
Ventilated Disk
/
Ventilated Disk
/
Disk
/
235/50 R19
/
235/50 R19
Key Spec
1.5 L
-
103 BHP
195 HP - 341 HP
Automatic
7DCT & DHT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
كهربائي
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5 L
1.6
Gasoline
Gasoline
None
/
4
/
103 BHP
195 HP
135 Nm
290
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
ECO / NORMAL / SPORT
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Rush 1.5L EX
Omoda C7 Comfort
- Power Tailgate
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Steering Adjustment
- Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK）
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Spare Wheel
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive design
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Economical fuel efficiency
Negative
- Engine performance is poor at high speeds
- Low quality interior design
- Lack of modern technical features
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Rush 1.5L EX if you care more about price; choose Omoda C7 Comfort if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Rush 1.5L EX has a fuel consumption of 8, while Omoda C7 Comfort has a fuel consumption of 7.52. Therefore, Omoda C7 Comfort is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Rush 1.5L EX has a wheelbase of 2685 mm, while Omoda C7 Comfort has a wheelbase of 2720. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Omoda C7 Comfort, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Rush 1.5L EX uses Rear Wheel Drive, while Omoda C7 Comfort uses No data.