RX5 1.5T COM vs Mazda CX-30 2024 2.0L Core 2WD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190 km/h
192
/
4
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
18
/
4571 mm
4395
1855 mm
1795
1719 mm
1562
2708 mm
2655
430 L
430
145
/
Fuel Economy
14.7 Km/L
16.7
55 L
48
14.7 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
2
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
14.1
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
7DCT
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
225/50 R18
/
225/50 R18
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
1.5 L - 2.0 L
2.0 L - 2.0 L
169 BHP - 220 BHP
153 HP - 155 BHP
7DCT & Automatic
6 Sp SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
171 BHP
155 BHP
275 Nm
200
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
RX5 1.5T COM
- 360 Degree camera
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
Mazda CX-30 2024 2.0L Core 2WD
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear AC Controls
- Electric Curtain - Rear
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Seats - Comfort
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Runflat Tyres
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Door Reflectors
- Electric anti-dazzling room mirror
- Tire Repair Kit
- Security System
- Pedestrian airbag
- First Aid Kit
- Fire Extinguisher
- Door Edge Protector
- Crosswind Assist
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Active Bonnet
- Acceleration Skid Control
- Collision Detection
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Speed Limiter
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- Powerful engine performance
- Spacious internal storage capacity
- High quality interior materials
Negative
- Fuel consumption is higher than expected
- Relatively old navigation technologies
- Off-road driving comfort is limited
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose RX5 1.5T COM if you care more about interior space; choose Mazda CX-30 2024 2.0L Core 2WD if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, RX5 1.5T COM has a fuel consumption of 6.8, while Mazda CX-30 2024 2.0L Core 2WD has a fuel consumption of 5.99. Therefore, Mazda CX-30 2024 2.0L Core 2WD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, RX5 1.5T COM has a wheelbase of 2708 mm, while Mazda CX-30 2024 2.0L Core 2WD has a wheelbase of 2655. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, RX5 1.5T COM, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. RX5 1.5T COM uses Front Wheel Drive, while Mazda CX-30 2024 2.0L Core 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive.