RX5 1.5T STD vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190 km/h
200 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
18
/
4571 mm
4760 mm
1855 mm
1930 mm
1719 mm
1927 mm
2708 mm
2750 mm
430 L
400 L
145
224 m
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
14.7 Km/L
10 Km/L
55 L
75 L
14.7 Km/L
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
2
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
14.1
12.3
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
6
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
Transmission
7DCT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
225/50 R18
/
225/50 R18
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 2.0 L
2.0 L
169 BHP - 220 BHP
224 BHP
7DCT & Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
171 BHP
224 BHP
275 Nm
387 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
RX5 1.5T STD
- 360 Degree camera
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
300 Challenger 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose RX5 1.5T STD if you care more about price; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, RX5 1.5T STD has a fuel consumption of 6.8, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, RX5 1.5T STD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, RX5 1.5T STD has a wheelbase of 2708 mm, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 300 Challenger 2.0T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. RX5 1.5T STD uses Front Wheel Drive, while 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.