RX5 1.5T STD vs MG HS 2020 2.0T Comfort Comparison
Car Information
SUV
/
9.4
/
Engine / Motor
190 km/h
210
/
4
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
18
/
4571 mm
4.574
1855 mm
1.876
1719 mm
1.685
2708 mm
2.720
430 L
463
145
/
Fuel Economy
14.7 Km/L
12.2
55 L
55
14.7 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
2
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
14.1
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
7DCT
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
225/50 R18
/
225/50 R18
/
/
✓
Key Spec
1.5 L
1.5 L - 1500 L
169 BHP - 171 BHP
127 - 258 BHP
7DCT & Automatic
9AT & Automatic & DCT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Petrol
171 BHP
231 BHP
275 Nm
360
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
RX5 1.5T STD
- 360 Degree camera
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
MG HS 2020 2.0T Comfort
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- 360 Degree Camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear AC Controls
- Temperature Display
- Rear Camera
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Speed Limiter
- Spare Wheel
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Powerful engine performance
- Spacious internal storage capacity
- High quality interior materials
Negative
- Fuel consumption is higher than expected
- Relatively old navigation technologies
- Off-road driving comfort is limited
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMG HS 2020 2.0T Comfort
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose RX5 1.5T STD if you care more about fuel economy; choose MG HS 2020 2.0T Comfort if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, RX5 1.5T STD has a fuel consumption of 6.8, while MG HS 2020 2.0T Comfort has a fuel consumption of 8.2. Therefore, RX5 1.5T STD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, RX5 1.5T STD has a wheelbase of 2708 mm, while MG HS 2020 2.0T Comfort has a wheelbase of 2.720. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, RX5 1.5T STD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. RX5 1.5T STD uses Front Wheel Drive, while MG HS 2020 2.0T Comfort uses Front Wheel Drive.