RX9 COM 4WD vs ZR-V LX Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
4
Dimensions
7
5
21
18 英寸
4983
4567
1967
1840
1786
1621
2915
2657
/
1488
/
380
/
186
Fuel Economy
14.8
/
70
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
3
/
✓
/
255/45 R21
/
✓
√
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
9
12
8
Bose
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
9-Speed Automatic
Automatic
/
✓
/
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Drive
MacPhersan
麦弗逊式独立悬挂
Multi-link
多连杆式独立悬挂
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
✓
255/45 R21
225/55 R18
255/45 R21
225/55 R18
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
2.0 L
1.5 L - 1.5 L
235 BHP
178 BHP - 180
9-Speed Automatic
Automatic & CVT
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
1.5
Gasoline
Gasoline
235 BHP
180
350
240
/
In-Line
/
Turbocharge
/
1.5L VTEC Turbo
/
有
/
4
/
132.4
/
6000
/
1700-4500
/
直喷
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
RX9 COM 4WD
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Push Button Start
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Number of Airbags
- Blind Spot Warning
- Spare Wheel
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
ZR-V LX
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Lane Following Assist
- Driving Recorder
- ABS
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickZR-V LX
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose RX9 COM 4WD if you care more about interior space; choose ZR-V LX if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, RX9 COM 4WD has a fuel consumption of 6.76, while ZR-V LX has a fuel consumption of 6.06. Therefore, ZR-V LX is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, RX9 COM 4WD has a wheelbase of 2915, while ZR-V LX has a wheelbase of 2657. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, RX9 COM 4WD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. RX9 COM 4WD uses Four-Wheel Drive, while ZR-V LX uses Front Drive.