S e-tron GT vs Mercedes‑AMG GT 53 4MATIC+ 4‑Door Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
5
4
/
2070
/
5054.6
/
2070.1
/
1455.42
/
2951.48
Fuel Economy
/
9
Interior
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
Safety
/
✓
Infotainment
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
DHT
SPEEDSHIFT® TCT 9-speed
Chassis & Steering
/
Four-Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
680 BHP
429 HP - 831 hp
DHT
9-speed automatic & AMG SPEEDSHIFT® MCT 9-speed & Automatic & SPEEDSHIFT® TCT 9-speed
Electric
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
/
5
2 Seater - 4
/
4.0 L - 4.0 L
/
TBD
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
680 BHP
429 HP
/
In-Line
/
3.0L
/
✓
/
429 hp @ 6,100 rpm
/
520
Exterior
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
S e-tron GT
Mercedes‑AMG GT 53 4MATIC+ 4‑Door
- Intelligent Emergency Call
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful engine performance and excellent driving interaction
- Sporty and luxurious exterior design draws attention
- High-end interior quality and advanced driving technologies
Negative
- High price and large maintenance costs
- Limited driving comfort on normal roads
- Limited space for passengers and luggage
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMercedes‑AMG GT 53 4MATIC+ 4‑Door
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose S e-tron GT if you care more about power; choose Mercedes‑AMG GT 53 4MATIC+ 4‑Door if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, S e-tron GT has a fuel consumption of No data, while Mercedes‑AMG GT 53 4MATIC+ 4‑Door has a fuel consumption of 11.11. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, S e-tron GT has a wheelbase of No data, while Mercedes‑AMG GT 53 4MATIC+ 4‑Door has a wheelbase of 2951.48. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. S e-tron GT uses No data, while Mercedes‑AMG GT 53 4MATIC+ 4‑Door uses Four-Wheel Drive.