S4 TFSI quattro 3.0L vs Charger Scatpack 6.4L V8 WideBody Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
280 km/h
6
8
2995 cc
6400 cc
GCC
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
4 Doors
4726 mm
5105 mm
1842 mm
1989 mm
1427 mm
1468 mm
2820 mm
3028 mm
410 L
467 L
165 m
132 m
Fuel Economy
8 Km/L
6 Km/L
55 L
70 L
8 Km/L
6 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Smart Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
Dual Zone
Dual Zone
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
Bucket
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
8
8.4
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
8
6
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.0 L
3.6 L - 6.4 L
354 BHP
292 BHP - 797 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
V
V
3.0 L
6.4 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
4
354 BHP
485 BHP
500 Nm
644 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
S4 TFSI quattro 3.0L
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Charger Scatpack 6.4L V8 WideBody
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Amazing power and acceleration
- Unique American muscular design
- Pleasant driving experience and excellent control
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- The quality of interior materials is average
- Suspension comfort is not ideal
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose S4 TFSI quattro 3.0L if you care more about price; choose Charger Scatpack 6.4L V8 WideBody if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, S4 TFSI quattro 3.0L has a fuel consumption of 12.5, while Charger Scatpack 6.4L V8 WideBody has a fuel consumption of 16.67. Therefore, S4 TFSI quattro 3.0L is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, S4 TFSI quattro 3.0L has a wheelbase of 2820 mm, while Charger Scatpack 6.4L V8 WideBody has a wheelbase of 3028 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Charger Scatpack 6.4L V8 WideBody, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. S4 TFSI quattro 3.0L uses All Wheel Drive, while Charger Scatpack 6.4L V8 WideBody uses Rear Wheel Drive.