Seal 7 2025 Design vs 508 1.6T Active+ Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180
223 km/h
4
/
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
18
/
4980
4830 mm
1890
1853 mm
1495
1456 mm
2900
2793 mm
465
545 L
Fuel Economy
16.1
14.7 Km/L
50
62 L
/
14.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Driver Seat
/
8.8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
Front Driver & Passenger Seats & Side Airbags
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12.8
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
Battery/Charging
6.6
/
Transmission
E-CVT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Macpherson
/
Multi-link
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
225/50 R18
/
225/50 R18
/
Key Spec
1.5
1.6 L - 1598 L
270 BHP
156 BHP - 225 BHP
E-CVT
Automatic
Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.5
1.6 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
270 BHP
165 BHP
231
240 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Seal 7 2025 Design
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Door Edge Protector
- Crosswind Assist
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Auto Door Lock
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Lane Departure Warning
508 1.6T Active+
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- Stylish and modern exterior design
- Fast dynamic performance and smooth driving
- Advanced interior technologies and luxurious experience
Negative
- High price compared to competitors
- Charging networks are insufficient in some areas
- Interior comfort is affected by rigid suspension and noise
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's Pick508 1.6T Active+
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Seal 7 2025 Design if you care more about fuel economy; choose 508 1.6T Active+ if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Seal 7 2025 Design has a fuel consumption of 6.21, while 508 1.6T Active+ has a fuel consumption of 6.8. Therefore, Seal 7 2025 Design is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Seal 7 2025 Design has a wheelbase of 2900, while 508 1.6T Active+ has a wheelbase of 2793 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Seal 7 2025 Design, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Seal 7 2025 Design uses Front Drive, while 508 1.6T Active+ uses Front Wheel Drive.