Sonic 1.6 Base Sedan vs EQM5 T3 Edition Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
186 km/h
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
4 Seater
4397 mm
5040 mm
1735 mm
1910 mm
1516 mm
1569 mm
2525 mm
2990 mm
396 L
433 L
Fuel Economy
15.4 Km/L
/
46 L
/
15.4 Km/L
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.6 L
/
115 BHP
134 BHP
Automatic
DHT
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
4 Seater - 5 Seater
4 Seater - 5
/
TBD
/
TBD
Engine
1.6 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
115 BHP
134 BHP
155 Nm
/
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Sonic 1.6 Base Sedan
EQM5 T3 Edition
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEQM5 T3 Edition
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Sonic 1.6 Base Sedan if you care more about overall equipment; choose EQM5 T3 Edition if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Sonic 1.6 Base Sedan has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while EQM5 T3 Edition has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Sonic 1.6 Base Sedan has a wheelbase of 2525 mm, while EQM5 T3 Edition has a wheelbase of 2990 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EQM5 T3 Edition, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Sonic 1.6 Base Sedan uses Front Wheel Drive, while EQM5 T3 Edition uses Front Wheel Drive.