Sonic 1.6 LS Sedan vs Changan Eado 2016 Elite Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
186 km/h
180
/
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4397 mm
4620
1735 mm
1820
1516 mm
1490
2525 mm
2660
396 L
510
Fuel Economy
15.4 Km/L
13.9
46 L
52
15.4 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Key Spec
1.6 L
1.6 L
115 BHP
124 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
4 Seater - 5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.6 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
115 BHP
124 BHP
155 Nm
160
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Sonic 1.6 LS Sedan
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
Changan Eado 2016 Elite
- Keyless Entry
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickChangan Eado 2016 Elite
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Sonic 1.6 LS Sedan if you care more about fuel economy; choose Changan Eado 2016 Elite if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Sonic 1.6 LS Sedan has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while Changan Eado 2016 Elite has a fuel consumption of 7.19. Therefore, Sonic 1.6 LS Sedan is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Sonic 1.6 LS Sedan has a wheelbase of 2525 mm, while Changan Eado 2016 Elite has a wheelbase of 2660. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Changan Eado 2016 Elite, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Sonic 1.6 LS Sedan uses Front Wheel Drive, while Changan Eado 2016 Elite uses Front Wheel Drive.