Sonic 1.6 LS Sedan vs H7 2.0T Comfortable Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
186 km/h
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4397 mm
5095 mm
1735 mm
1875 mm
1516 mm
1485 mm
2525 mm
2970 mm
396 L
/
Fuel Economy
15.4 Km/L
16.7 Km/L
46 L
70 L
15.4 Km/L
16.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.6 L
1.8 L - 3.0 L
115 BHP
138 BHP - 228 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
4 Seater - 5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
Engine
1.6 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
115 BHP
204 BHP
155 Nm
260 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
Sonic 1.6 LS Sedan
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
H7 2.0T Comfortable
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickH7 2.0T Comfortable
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Sonic 1.6 LS Sedan if you care more about overall equipment; choose H7 2.0T Comfortable if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Sonic 1.6 LS Sedan has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while H7 2.0T Comfortable has a fuel consumption of 5.99. Therefore, H7 2.0T Comfortable is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Sonic 1.6 LS Sedan has a wheelbase of 2525 mm, while H7 2.0T Comfortable has a wheelbase of 2970 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, H7 2.0T Comfortable, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Sonic 1.6 LS Sedan uses Front Wheel Drive, while H7 2.0T Comfortable uses Front Wheel Drive.