Standard Petrol 2WD MT vs Ranger XL 2.0T (LOW) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
180 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
1970
/
17"
/
5370
5370 mm
1960
1918 mm
1880
1884 mm
3230
3270 mm
/
4 Doors
/
1200 L
/
230 m
Fuel Economy
8.33
8 Km/L
80
80 L
/
8 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
/
10
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
MT
/
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Four Wheel Drive
4x2
/
Double Wishbone
/
Leaf Spring
/
Hydraulic
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
-
2.0 L - 3.2 L
158 - 161
118 BHP - 392 BHP
AT & MT
10AT & 6MT & AT & Automatic & Manual
Diesel & Gasoline
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
3 Seater - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Front
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Halogen
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.4
2.0 L
Gasoline
Diesel
158
168 BHP
5500
/
230
405 Nm
4000
/
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Standard Petrol 2WD MT
Ranger XL 2.0T (LOW)
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Standard Petrol 2WD MT if you care more about price; choose Ranger XL 2.0T (LOW) if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Standard Petrol 2WD MT has a fuel consumption of 12, while Ranger XL 2.0T (LOW) has a fuel consumption of 12.5. Therefore, Standard Petrol 2WD MT is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Standard Petrol 2WD MT has a wheelbase of 3230, while Ranger XL 2.0T (LOW) has a wheelbase of 3270 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Ranger XL 2.0T (LOW), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Standard Petrol 2WD MT uses Rear Drive, while Ranger XL 2.0T (LOW) uses Four Wheel Drive.