Subaru Forester 2017 Subaru Forester 2017 2.5i vs Chery Tiggo 4 Pro 2023 1.5L Comfort Comparison
Car Information
11.5
/
✓
/
Engine / Motor
180
180
4
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4.595
4.318
1.796
1.83
1.686
1.67
2.640
/
974
340
Fuel Economy
9.5
/
60
51
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
CVT
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
/
✓
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.5 L
1.5 L - 1.5 L
150 BHP - 170 BHP
111 BHP - 156
Automatic & CVT
Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
1.5 L
Petrol
Petrol
170 BHP
113 BHP
235
143
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Subaru Forester 2017 Subaru Forester 2017 2.5i
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Keyless Entry
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Chery Tiggo 4 Pro 2023 1.5L Comfort
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Auto Door Lock
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickChery Tiggo 4 Pro 2023 1.5L Comfort
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Subaru Forester 2017 Subaru Forester 2017 2.5i if you care more about power; choose Chery Tiggo 4 Pro 2023 1.5L Comfort if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Subaru Forester 2017 Subaru Forester 2017 2.5i has a fuel consumption of 10.53, while Chery Tiggo 4 Pro 2023 1.5L Comfort has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Subaru Forester 2017 Subaru Forester 2017 2.5i has a wheelbase of 2.640, while Chery Tiggo 4 Pro 2023 1.5L Comfort has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Subaru Forester 2017 Subaru Forester 2017 2.5i uses All Wheel Drive, while Chery Tiggo 4 Pro 2023 1.5L Comfort uses Front Wheel Drive.