Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L M/T vs Soul 1.6L MPI A/T STD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
155
/
3
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
3600
4196 mm
1600
1801 mm
1540
1600 mm
2425
2601 mm
254
/
Fuel Economy
23.3
12.7 Km/L
35
54 L
/
12.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Manual
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.0 L - 1.1 L
1.6 L - 2.0 L
67 BHP
122 BHP - 152 BHP
Automatic & Manual
Automatic & Manual
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
4 Seater - 5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.0 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
67 BHP
124 BHP
90
152 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L M/T
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Entry
- ABS
Soul 1.6L MPI A/T STD
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickSuzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L M/T
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L M/T if you care more about price; choose Soul 1.6L MPI A/T STD if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L M/T has a fuel consumption of 4.29, while Soul 1.6L MPI A/T STD has a fuel consumption of 7.87. Therefore, Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L M/T is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L M/T has a wheelbase of 2425, while Soul 1.6L MPI A/T STD has a wheelbase of 2601 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Soul 1.6L MPI A/T STD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L M/T uses Front Wheel Drive, while Soul 1.6L MPI A/T STD uses Front Wheel Drive.