Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L M/T vs Volvo V40 2013 T5 R Design Plus Comparison
Engine / Motor
155
/
3
5
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
3600
4370
1600
2041
1540
1458
2425
1552
254
496
Fuel Economy
23.3
12.3
35
62
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Manual
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Key Spec
1.0 L - 1.1 L
2.0 L
67 BHP
180 BHP - 253 BHP
Automatic & Manual
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
4 Seater - 5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
67 BHP
213 BHP
90
300
Technologies
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L M/T
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Entry
- ABS
Volvo V40 2013 T5 R Design Plus
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Entry
- Seats - Comfort
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- Pedestrian airbag
- First Aid Kit
- Active Bonnet
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Speed Limiter
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickVolvo V40 2013 T5 R Design Plus
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L M/T if you care more about fuel economy; choose Volvo V40 2013 T5 R Design Plus if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L M/T has a fuel consumption of 4.29, while Volvo V40 2013 T5 R Design Plus has a fuel consumption of 8.13. Therefore, Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L M/T is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L M/T has a wheelbase of 2425, while Volvo V40 2013 T5 R Design Plus has a wheelbase of 1552. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L M/T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L M/T uses Front Wheel Drive, while Volvo V40 2013 T5 R Design Plus uses Front Wheel Drive.