Swift GL vs MG3 1.5 COM Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
/
5
/
16
/
4113
/
1797
/
1502
/
2570
Fuel Economy
/
17.8
/
45
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
9
7
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
4
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
/
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
Transmission
/
CVT
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Drive
/
McPherson
/
Torison beam
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
/
195/55 R16
/
195/55 R16
Key Spec
1.2 L - 1197 L
1.5 L
82 BHP - 136 BHP
109 BHP
Automatic & CVT
CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Engine
1.2L
1.5 L
/
Gasoline
/
109 BHP
/
140
Exterior
/
كهربائي
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Swift GL
MG3 1.5 COM
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Push Button Start
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- Spare Wheel
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Review Comparison
Positive
- Smooth and flexible command and control
- Economical fuel consumption
- Modern and attractive exterior design
Negative
- Narrow rear seats and storage space
- Driving comfort and suspension need to be improved
- Lack of technology and accessories details
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickSwift GL
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Swift GL if you care more about price; choose MG3 1.5 COM if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Swift GL has a fuel consumption of No data, while MG3 1.5 COM has a fuel consumption of 5.62. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Swift GL has a wheelbase of No data, while MG3 1.5 COM has a wheelbase of 2570. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Swift GL uses No data, while MG3 1.5 COM uses Front Drive.