CarteaCompare CarsT60 Petrol Double Cab 2WD Elite vs Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L XLT FX4 D/C 4X4

T60 Petrol Double Cab 2WD Elite vs Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L XLT FX4 D/C 4X4 Comparison

Car Information

/

10.6

/

Engine / Motor

/

175

/

5

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

1880

/

16

/

5365

5.362

1900

1.976

1809

1.816

3155

3.221

215

/

/

1180

Fuel Economy

/

11.1

/

80

Comfort

/

Manual

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

Front Row Seats

/

Fabric

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

2

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

7

/

/

4

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

6AT

Automatic

/

/

Chassis & Steering

Double Wishbone

/

Leaf Spring

/

/

/

/

/

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

245/70 R16 HT

/

245/70 R16 HT

/

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.8 L

2.0 L - 3.2 L

147 BHP - 215 BHP

118 BHP - 392 BHP

6AT & 6MT

10AT & 6MT & AT & Automatic & Manual

Diesel & Gasoline

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5

3 Seater - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

3.2 L

Gasoline

Diesel

215 BHP

200 BHP

160

/

330

470

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • T60 Petrol Double Cab 2WD Elite

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Start
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Number of Airbags
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Seat belt reminder
  • Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L XLT FX4 D/C 4X4

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Cool Box
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Number of Airbags
    • Runflat Tyres
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Active Bonnet
    • Collision Detection
    • Crash Auto Door Unlock
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickFord Ranger 2023 3.2L XLT FX4 D/C 4X4

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose T60 Petrol Double Cab 2WD Elite if you care more about interior space; choose Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L XLT FX4 D/C 4X4 if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

Maxus | T60 Petrol Double Cab 2WD Elite

VS

Rely | Standard Petrol 2WD MT

Maxus | T60 Petrol Double Cab 2WD Elite

VS

Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi L200 2021 2.4L Single Cab GL (2WD)

Maxus | T60 Petrol Double Cab 2WD Elite

VS

Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi L200 2018 2.4L Single Cab GL (2WD)

Maxus | T60 Petrol Double Cab 2WD Elite

VS

Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi L200 2019 2.4L Single Cab GL (2WD)

Maxus | T60 Petrol Double Cab 2WD Elite

VS

Great Wall | Wingle 5 PETROL 4X2

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, T60 Petrol Double Cab 2WD Elite has a fuel consumption of No data, while Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L XLT FX4 D/C 4X4 has a fuel consumption of 9.01. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, T60 Petrol Double Cab 2WD Elite has a wheelbase of 3155, while Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L XLT FX4 D/C 4X4 has a wheelbase of 3.221. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, T60 Petrol Double Cab 2WD Elite, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. T60 Petrol Double Cab 2WD Elite uses No data, while Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L XLT FX4 D/C 4X4 uses All Wheel Drive.