CarteaCompare CarsT99 PRE vs XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater)

T99 PRE vs XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater) Comparison

Car Information

165

/

340

/

4800×1915×1685

/

2.0

/

Engine / Motor

/

200 km/h

/

4

/

2490 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

1775

/

19 inch

/

4800

4680 mm

1915

1840 mm

1685

1725 mm

2870

2706 mm

377

550 L

/

5 Doors

Fuel Economy

14.1

15.6 Km/L

60

60 L

/

15.6 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

✓✓

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

6

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12.3

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

8

/

Transmission

/

Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

Electronic Parking

/

245/50 R19

/

245/50 R19

/

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

2.5 L

221 BHP - 224

132 BHP - 188 BHP

8AT & Automatic

Automatic & CVT & Xtronic CVT

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

5 Seater - 7 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0

2.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

Turbocharge

/

224

188 BHP

165

/

340

244 Nm

95

/

/

In-Line

/

None

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • T99 PRE

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Power Tailgate
    • Electric Locks
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Seats - Comfort
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Lane Following Assist
    • Driving Recorder
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Active Safety Warning System
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
    • Seat belt reminder
  • XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater)

    • 360 Degree camera
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Excellent off-road driving performance and stable control
  • Spacious interior space suitable for families and luggage
  • High safety equipment increases confidence while driving

Negative

  • Motor performance is less responsive in acceleration
  • Fuel consumption is high in the city
  • The quality of interior materials and technology need to be improved

Related comparisons

Editor's PickT99 PRE

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose T99 PRE if you care more about price; choose XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater) if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

Bestune | T99 PRE

VS

Exeed | LX Luxury

Bestune | T99 PRE

VS

Peugeot | 2008 1.2T GT (155HP)

Bestune | T99 PRE

VS

Nissan | XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater)

Bestune | T99 PRE

VS

Jeep | Renegade Limited

Bestune | T99 PRE

VS

Jeep | Renegade Trailhawk

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, T99 PRE has a fuel consumption of 7.09, while XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater) has a fuel consumption of 6.41. Therefore, XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater) is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, T99 PRE has a wheelbase of 2870, while XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater) has a wheelbase of 2706 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, T99 PRE, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. T99 PRE uses Front Drive, while XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater) uses Front Wheel Drive.