Tahoe LS vs Grand Cherokee L 3.6L Limited+ Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
190 km/h
/
6
Dimensions
7 Seater
7
18
/
5 Doors
5 Doors
5181
4828 mm
2053
1943 mm
1925
1792 mm
3071
2916 mm
3479
782 L
Fuel Economy
9.7
/
100
93 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Smart Key
/
/
✓
Interior
8
/
✓
/
Gideon/Dark Atmosphere premium cloth
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
2nd Row Manual 60:40 Split
Safety
✓
/
frontal airbags for driver and front outboard passenger; seat-mounted side-impact airbags for driver and front outboard passenger; driver inboard seat-mounted side-impact airbag; headcurtain airbags for all rows in outboard seating positions3,4
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
AT
/
10
/
10AT
8AT
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
5.3 L - 6.2 L
3.6 L - 6.4 L
320 BHP - 420 BHP
286 BHP - 707 BHP
10 Speed AT & 10AT & Automatic
8AT & Automatic
Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 Seater - 9 Seater
5 - 7
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
Black w/chrome accents Grill
/
✓
/
Black w/chrome accents Grill
Engine
5.3 L
3.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
355 BHP
293 HP
518
350 Nm
/
3.6L Pentastar V6 engine
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tahoe LS
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
Grand Cherokee L 3.6L Limited+
- 360 Degree Camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Versatility of options for powerful engines
- Impressive off-road driving capabilities
- High-end interior, equipped with modern technologies
Negative
- High fuel consumption for some models
- High price compared to some competitors
- Large size, difficult to maneuver in confined spaces
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tahoe LS if you care more about price; choose Grand Cherokee L 3.6L Limited+ if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tahoe LS has a fuel consumption of 10.31, while Grand Cherokee L 3.6L Limited+ has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tahoe LS has a wheelbase of 3071, while Grand Cherokee L 3.6L Limited+ has a wheelbase of 2916 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Tahoe LS, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tahoe LS uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Grand Cherokee L 3.6L Limited+ uses All Wheel Drive.