CarteaCompare CarsTerritory Titanium vs Cherokee 3.2L Longitude

Territory Titanium vs Cherokee 3.2L Longitude Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

185 km/h

4

/

1798 cc

/

GCC

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

5 Doors

5 Doors

4630 mm

4624 mm

1935 mm

1860 mm

1706 mm

1681 mm

2726 mm

2718 mm

385 L

841 L

190 mm

/

Fuel Economy

15.9

9.9 Km/L

60 L

60 L

12 Km/L

9.9 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

/

/

Interior

12.3

/

/

All Liquid Cluster

/

/

Leather Trim

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12

/

/

/

/

/

8

/

Transmission

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

1.8 L

2.4 L - 3.2 L

190 BHP

184 BHP - 272 BHP

Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

1.8 L

3.2 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

4

/

190 BHP

271 BHP

320

324 Nm

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Territory Titanium

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Collision Detection
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • Cherokee 3.2L Longitude

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Cohesive and stylish exterior design
  • Spacious and comfortable interior
  • Balanced engine and steering performance

Negative

  • Improve the quality of interior materials and assembly
  • Modernization of technological and entertainment systems
  • Improved suspension characteristics to reduce vibration

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickTerritory Titanium

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Territory Titanium if you care more about price; choose Cherokee 3.2L Longitude if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

Ford | Territory Titanium

VS

Jeep | Cherokee 3.2L Longitude

Ford | Territory Titanium

VS

Toyota | Corolla Cross 1.8L GLI (HEV)

Ford | Territory Titanium

VS

Opel | Mokka 1.2T Ultimate

Ford | Territory Titanium

VS

Geely | Geely Geometry C 2024 400 GS

Ford | Territory Titanium

VS

Haval | Haval H9 2018 2.0L Luxury (4WD)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Territory Titanium has a fuel consumption of 6.29, while Cherokee 3.2L Longitude has a fuel consumption of 10.1. Therefore, Territory Titanium is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Territory Titanium has a wheelbase of 2726 mm, while Cherokee 3.2L Longitude has a wheelbase of 2718 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Territory Titanium, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Territory Titanium uses Front Drive, while Cherokee 3.2L Longitude uses All Wheel Drive.