CarteaCompare CarsTerritory Titanium vs CX60 2025 High Plus

Territory Titanium vs CX60 2025 High Plus Comparison

Car Information

/

450

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

/

4

/

1798 cc

/

GCC

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

7 Seater

5 Doors

/

4630 mm

4740

1935 mm

1890

1706 mm

1686

2726 mm

/

385 L

/

190 mm

/

/

20 Inch

Fuel Economy

15.9

/

60 L

/

12 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

/

/

/

Interior

12.3

/

/

All Liquid Cluster

/

/

Leather Trim

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12

12 Inch

/

/

/

8

12

/

Bose

Transmission

Automatic

8-speed Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

Four-Wheel Drive

Key Spec

1.8 L

3.3 L - 3.3 L

190 BHP

280 HP - 284 BHP

Automatic

8 SPEED SKYACTIV® WITH Mi-DRIVE & 8-speed Automatic

Gasoline

Gasoline & Hybrid

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5 - 7 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

1.8 L

3.3 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

4

/

190 BHP

284 BHP

320

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Territory Titanium

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Collision Detection
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • CX60 2025 High Plus

    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Cohesive and stylish exterior design
  • Spacious and comfortable interior
  • Balanced engine and steering performance

Negative

  • Improve the quality of interior materials and assembly
  • Modernization of technological and entertainment systems
  • Improved suspension characteristics to reduce vibration

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickCX60 2025 High Plus

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Territory Titanium if you care more about overall equipment; choose CX60 2025 High Plus if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Ford | Territory Titanium

VS

Jeep | Cherokee 3.2L Longitude

Ford | Territory Titanium

VS

Toyota | Corolla Cross 1.8L GLI (HEV)

Ford | Territory Titanium

VS

Opel | Mokka 1.2T Ultimate

Ford | Territory Titanium

VS

Geely | Geely Geometry C 2024 400 GS

Ford | Territory Titanium

VS

Haval | Haval H9 2018 2.0L Luxury (4WD)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Territory Titanium has a fuel consumption of 6.29, while CX60 2025 High Plus has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Territory Titanium has a wheelbase of 2726 mm, while CX60 2025 High Plus has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Territory Titanium uses Front Drive, while CX60 2025 High Plus uses Four-Wheel Drive.