Territory Titanium vs Kona 2.0L Comfort Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
194 km/h
4
/
1798 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
/
4630 mm
4165 mm
1935 mm
1801 mm
1706 mm
1565 mm
2726 mm
2600 mm
385 L
544 L
190 mm
/
Fuel Economy
15.9
13.3 Km/L
60 L
50 L
12 Km/L
13.3 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
/
Interior
12.3
/
✓
/
All Liquid Cluster
/
✓
/
Leather Trim
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.8 L
1.6 L - 2.0 L
190 BHP
105 BHP - 204
Automatic
AT & Automatic
Gasoline
Electric & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
/
1.8 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
4
/
190 BHP
150 BHP
320
180 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Territory Titanium
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Collision Detection
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Kona 2.0L Comfort
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- Cohesive and stylish exterior design
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Balanced engine and steering performance
Negative
- Improve the quality of interior materials and assembly
- Modernization of technological and entertainment systems
- Improved suspension characteristics to reduce vibration
Positive
- Modern and stylish design
- Economical in fuel consumption
- Advanced technical features
Negative
- Limited storage space
- Poor off road performance
- Light noise inside the cabin at high speeds
Related comparisons
Editor's PickKona 2.0L Comfort
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Territory Titanium if you care more about fuel economy; choose Kona 2.0L Comfort if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Territory Titanium has a fuel consumption of 6.29, while Kona 2.0L Comfort has a fuel consumption of 7.52. Therefore, Territory Titanium is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Territory Titanium has a wheelbase of 2726 mm, while Kona 2.0L Comfort has a wheelbase of 2600 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Territory Titanium, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Territory Titanium uses Front Drive, while Kona 2.0L Comfort uses Front Wheel Drive.