Tesla Model X (AWD) vs Wrangler Rubicon 392 6.4L V8 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
220 km/h
American
GCC
/
8
/
6400 cc
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
4 Doors
5057 mm
4785 mm
2271 mm
1877 mm
1689 mm
1869 mm
2965 mm
3007 mm
359 L
487 L
167 mm
274 m
Fuel Economy
/
6 Km/L
/
87 L
/
6 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Keyless Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Standard
/
✓
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
9
Transmission
AT
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Air
/
Air
/
Electric Power Steering (EPS)
/
Key Spec
TBD
/
259 BHP - 1020 BHP
270 BHP - 470
AT & Automatic
8AT & Automatic & Manual
Electric
Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol
543 km - 576 km
/
5 Seater - 7 Seater
4 - 5 Seater
/
2.0 L - 6.4 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
670 BHP
470 BHP
400 Nm
637 Nm
/
V
/
6.4 L
/
4
Motor
10
/
Lithium-Ion
/
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tesla Model X (AWD)
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Wrangler Rubicon 392 6.4L V8
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Superior off-road capability
- Classic and attractive design
- Wide customization capability
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Driving comfort is less on ordinary roads
- The high price of fully equipped models
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tesla Model X (AWD) if you care more about price; choose Wrangler Rubicon 392 6.4L V8 if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tesla Model X (AWD) has a fuel consumption of No data, while Wrangler Rubicon 392 6.4L V8 has a fuel consumption of 16.67. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tesla Model X (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2965 mm , while Wrangler Rubicon 392 6.4L V8 has a wheelbase of 3007 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Wrangler Rubicon 392 6.4L V8, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tesla Model X (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive , while Wrangler Rubicon 392 6.4L V8 uses Front Wheel Drive.