Ti 3 RWD Pro vs CS35 Plus Trend Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4605
4335
1900
1825
1720
1660
/
17
/
4
/
2600
Fuel Economy
/
17.3
/
53
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
Interior
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Mocha Leather
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
Dual Airbag (Driver & Passenger)
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
10.25 Inch
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
DHT
DCT
/
DCT
/
7
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Front Drive
/
Electric
Wheels/brakes
235/60 R18
215/55 R17
235/60 R18
215/55 R17
Key Spec
TBD
/
218 BHP - 422 BHP
156 BHP - 158 BHP
DHT
DCT
Electric
Gasoline
TBD
/
5
5 Seater
/
1.4 L - 1.4 L
/
TBD
Engine
/
1.4 T
Electric
Gasoline
218 BHP
158 BHP
/
260
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Sport
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Ti 3 RWD Pro
CS35 Plus Trend
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Number of Airbags
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickTi 3 RWD Pro
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Ti 3 RWD Pro if you care more about price; choose CS35 Plus Trend if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Ti 3 RWD Pro has a fuel consumption of No data, while CS35 Plus Trend has a fuel consumption of 5.78. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Ti 3 RWD Pro has a wheelbase of No data, while CS35 Plus Trend has a wheelbase of 2600. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Ti 3 RWD Pro uses Rear Drive, while CS35 Plus Trend uses Front Drive.