Ti 3 RWD Pro vs EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters Comparison

Car Information

7.9

6.5

501

≥400

65.28

/

/

160+160

Engine / Motor

/

N/A, Electric

Dimensions

5

7 Seater

4605

5209

1900

2010

1720

1731

/

3110

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

Transmission

DHT

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Rear Drive

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

235/60 R18

/

235/60 R18

/

/

Key Spec

TBD

TBD

218 BHP - 422 BHP

429 BHP - 543 BHP

DHT

Automatic

Electric

Electric

TBD

320 km

5

6 - 7 Seater

Engine

/

0.0 L

Electric

Electric

218 BHP

429 BHP

/

600

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Ti 3 RWD Pro

    • EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters

      • Electronic engine immobilizer
      • Power Tailgate
      • Keyless Entry
      • Rear Camera
      • Steering Adjustment
      • Anti-Theft Alarm System
      • Pedestrian airbag
      • Fire Extinguisher
      • Door Edge Protector
      • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
      • Collision Detection
      • Blind Spot Warning
      • Auto Door Lock
      • Spare Wheel
      • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
      • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
      • ABS
      • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
      • Lane Departure Warning

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickTi 3 RWD Pro

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose Ti 3 RWD Pro if you care more about price; choose EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters if you care more about power.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Denza | Ti 3 RWD Pro

    VS

    MG | MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD

    Denza | Ti 3 RWD Pro

    VS

    JAC | JAC S3 2024 1.6L Intelligent

    Denza | Ti 3 RWD Pro

    VS

    Renault | Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025

    Denza | Ti 3 RWD Pro

    VS

    Renault | All-New Duster PE 1.6L 4×2 CVT

    Denza | Ti 3 RWD Pro

    VS

    JAC | JAC S3 2023 1.6L Intelligent

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, Ti 3 RWD Pro has a fuel consumption of No data, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, Ti 3 RWD Pro has a wheelbase of No data, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a wheelbase of 3110. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Ti 3 RWD Pro uses Rear Drive, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters uses All Wheel Drive.