Tiggo 4 Pro COM 2025 vs Sealion 05EV 430 Standard Comparison
Car Information
/
SUV/
430
Dimensions
Flush Door
/
5
5
17
/
5
/
4318
4520
1831
1860
1662
1630
2610
2720
Fuel Economy
/
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
Cloth
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
Dual Front Airbags
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
/
Transmission
CVT
DHT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
/
Wheels/brakes
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.5 L
1.5
111 BHP - 156
190 BHP - 210
Automatic & CVT
AT & DHT
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5
Exterior
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.5 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
1.5L
/
111 BHP
190 BHP
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
ECO, Normal
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tiggo 4 Pro COM 2025
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
Sealion 05EV 430 Standard
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickSealion 05EV 430 Standard
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tiggo 4 Pro COM 2025 if you care more about overall equipment; choose Sealion 05EV 430 Standard if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tiggo 4 Pro COM 2025 has a fuel consumption of No data, while Sealion 05EV 430 Standard has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tiggo 4 Pro COM 2025 has a wheelbase of 2610, while Sealion 05EV 430 Standard has a wheelbase of 2720. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Sealion 05EV 430 Standard, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tiggo 4 Pro COM 2025 uses Front Drive, while Sealion 05EV 430 Standard uses No data.