Tiggo 4 Pro COM 2025 vs Suzuki Vitara 2020 1.6L GLX 2WD Comparison
Engine / Motor
/
180
/
4
Dimensions
Flush Door
/
5
5 Seater
17
/
5
/
4318
4175
1831
1775
1662
1610
2610
2500
/
375
Fuel Economy
/
17.2
/
47
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
✓
Cloth
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
Dual Front Airbags
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.25
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
4
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.5 L
1.6 L - 1586 L
111 BHP - 156
115 BHP
Automatic & CVT
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Exterior
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
1.5L
/
111 BHP
115 BHP
/
156
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
ECO, Normal
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tiggo 4 Pro COM 2025
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
Suzuki Vitara 2020 1.6L GLX 2WD
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Speed Limiter
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickTiggo 4 Pro COM 2025
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tiggo 4 Pro COM 2025 if you care more about price; choose Suzuki Vitara 2020 1.6L GLX 2WD if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tiggo 4 Pro COM 2025 has a fuel consumption of No data, while Suzuki Vitara 2020 1.6L GLX 2WD has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tiggo 4 Pro COM 2025 has a wheelbase of 2610, while Suzuki Vitara 2020 1.6L GLX 2WD has a wheelbase of 2500. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Tiggo 4 Pro COM 2025, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tiggo 4 Pro COM 2025 uses Front Drive, while Suzuki Vitara 2020 1.6L GLX 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive.