Tiggo 4 Pro COM 2025 vs Standard 2WD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
180
Dimensions
Flush Door
/
5
5
17
/
5
/
4318
4710
1831
1930
1662
1620
2610
2875
/
2220
Fuel Economy
/
/
/
56
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Manual
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
Cloth
Nappa Leather Seat
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Front Row Seats
/
10.25
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front
Safety
✓
✓
Dual Front Airbags
6
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.25
12.3
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
11
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Battery/Charging
/
30 Min
/
3.3 Hours
Transmission
CVT
AT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Drive
/
Double-Wishbone Front Independent Suspension With Four - Ball Joint
/
Multi-Link Trapezoidal Arm Rear Independent Suspension
Wheels/brakes
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
/
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.5 L
1.5T
111 BHP - 156
435
Automatic & CVT
AT
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5
Exterior
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5T
Gasoline
Hybrid
1.5L
/
111 BHP
435
/
325
/
420
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
ECO, Normal
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
45 Min (30-80%)
/
4.5 Hrs ( 30-80% )
/
Lithium Iron Phosphate
/
Lithium Iron Phosphate
/
R：PMSM
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tiggo 4 Pro COM 2025
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
Standard 2WD
- 360 Degree Camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- First Aid Kit
- Blind Spot Warning
- Auto Door Lock
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tiggo 4 Pro COM 2025 if you care more about price; choose Standard 2WD if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tiggo 4 Pro COM 2025 has a fuel consumption of No data, while Standard 2WD has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tiggo 4 Pro COM 2025 has a wheelbase of 2610, while Standard 2WD has a wheelbase of 2875. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Standard 2WD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tiggo 4 Pro COM 2025 uses Front Drive, while Standard 2WD uses Front Drive.