CarteaCompare CarsTiggo 4 Pro COM 2025 vs T1 i-DM Standard

Tiggo 4 Pro COM 2025 vs T1 i-DM Standard Comparison

Car Information

/

117 KM

/

26.7

Engine / Motor

/

1499

Dimensions

Flush Door

/

5

5

17

/

5

5

4318

4705

1831

1967

1662

1843

2610

2800

/

2000

/

574

/

160

Fuel Economy

/

18.5

/

70

Comfort

/

/

/

Manual

/

/

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

/

Cloth

/

/

/

/

/

/

15.6"

/

10.25"

/

/

/

Safety

/

Dual Front Airbags

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

10.25

/

4

9

/

Battery/Charging

/

0.5

Transmission

CVT

1DHT

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

/

/

MacPherson

/

Electric Powered

Wheels/brakes

215/60 R17

235/60 R19

215/60 R17

235/60 R19

/

Ventilated

/

Disc

Key Spec

1.5 L - 1.5 L

1.5

111 BHP - 156

335

Automatic & CVT

1DHT

Gasoline & Petrol

Hybrid

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

5

Exterior

Electric

كهربائي

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.5 L

1.5

Gasoline

Hybrid

1.5L

/

111 BHP

335

/

/

/

530

Technologies

/

/

ECO, Normal

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Motor

/

310

/

LiFePO4 Battery

/

Permanent magnet synchronous motor

/

150

/

P3

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Tiggo 4 Pro COM 2025

    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Keyless Start
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
  • T1 i-DM Standard

    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Seatbelt pretensioner
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Active Safety Warning System
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickTiggo 4 Pro COM 2025

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Tiggo 4 Pro COM 2025 if you care more about price; choose T1 i-DM Standard if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Chery | Tiggo 4 Pro COM 2025

VS

Geely | Geely GS Sport 2020 1.8L Classic

Chery | Tiggo 4 Pro COM 2025

VS

Geely | Geely GS Sport 2021 1.8L Classic

Chery | Tiggo 4 Pro COM 2025

VS

Geely | Geely GS Sport 2018 1.8L Standard (Full Option)

Chery | Tiggo 4 Pro COM 2025

VS

Renault | Renault Captur 2018 1.2L SE

Chery | Tiggo 4 Pro COM 2025

VS

Suzuki | Suzuki Vitara 2020 1.6L GLX 2WD

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Tiggo 4 Pro COM 2025 has a fuel consumption of No data, while T1 i-DM Standard has a fuel consumption of 117 KM. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Tiggo 4 Pro COM 2025 has a wheelbase of 2610, while T1 i-DM Standard has a wheelbase of 2800. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, T1 i-DM Standard, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tiggo 4 Pro COM 2025 uses Front Drive, while T1 i-DM Standard uses No data.