Tiggo 8 Super Hybrid vs Cherokee 3.2L Longitude Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
185 km/h
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
19
/
4725
4624 mm
1860
1860 mm
1705
1681 mm
/
5 Doors
/
2718 mm
/
841 L
Fuel Economy
52.6
9.9 Km/L
/
60 L
/
9.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
10.25
/
✓
/
10.25"
/
✓
/
✓
/
Triple
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
/
Battery/Charging
4
/
Transmission
DHT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.5L
2.4 L - 3.2 L
279
184 BHP - 272 BHP
DHT
Automatic
Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7
5 Seater
Exterior
كهربائي
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5L
3.2 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
279
271 BHP
365
324 Nm
Motor
6.6
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Eco + Normal + Sport
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tiggo 8 Super Hybrid
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK）
- Number of Airbags
- Lane Following Assist
- Blind Spot Warning
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Cherokee 3.2L Longitude
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickTiggo 8 Super Hybrid
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tiggo 8 Super Hybrid if you care more about price; choose Cherokee 3.2L Longitude if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tiggo 8 Super Hybrid has a fuel consumption of 1.9, while Cherokee 3.2L Longitude has a fuel consumption of 10.1. Therefore, Tiggo 8 Super Hybrid is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tiggo 8 Super Hybrid has a wheelbase of No data, while Cherokee 3.2L Longitude has a wheelbase of 2718 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tiggo 8 Super Hybrid uses Front Drive, while Cherokee 3.2L Longitude uses All Wheel Drive.